\uD83D\uDDD3Date
\uD83D\uDC65Participants
Reckitt (RB):
Nathan McKean
Matt Lau
Robert RuszczykDataArt (DA):
Nikita Pushnyak
Julia Boyarshchikova
Sergey Kiselyov
Anton Merkulov
Nikita Puzyrenko
\uD83E\uDD45Goals
DA to tell about current progress, restrictions and next steps
RB to clarify remaining issues
Agree on first MVP steps implementation
✅Action items
- DA to provide updated estimates and budget after technical discussion and scope review Sergey Kiselyov (Unlicensed)Nikita.Pyshnyak@dataart.com
- RB to confirm the scope officially (review in the confluence, what is necessary and what is not) nathan.mckean@reckitt.com (Unlicensed) @Matt.Lau@reckitt.comGolebiewska, Aga (Unlicensed)
- Tech teams to discuss master vs develop approach, pros and cons. Anton Merkulov (Unlicensed)Paweł PłoneczkaRadoslaw Kowalewski (Unlicensed)
- To suggest and discuss visual regression testing, that is in fact should be automated screenshot comparison process in order to catch visual fails after components update. Sergey Kiselyov (Unlicensed)
- DA schedule the demo sessions every week (once development is started) Sergey Kiselyov (Unlicensed)
⤴Key takeaways
- List component and other components should be discussed on dedicated sessions
- It’s safer approach to include all components, for example the ‘Search’
- Priority order needs to be implemented, components development plan can be scheduled by DA
- Label (tag) is not mandatory part of MVP. But if it can be developed it’s better to include it into the scope
- Tag is a teaser in other shape
- Design related notes from nathan.mckean@reckitt.com (Unlicensed) should be discussed on meeting with Ekino